Contributors:
Hrim Mehta, Adam Bradley, Mark Hancock, and Christopher Collins
In the domain of literary criticism, many critics practice close reading, annotating by hand while performing a detailed analysis of a single text. Often this process employs the use of external resources to aid analysis. In this article, we present a study and subsequent tool design focused on leveraging a critic’s annotations as implicit interactions for initiating context-specific computational support that automatically searches external resources. We observed 14 poetry critics performing a close reading, revealing a set of cognitive practices supported through free-form annotation that have not previously been discussed in this context. We used guidelines derived from our study to design a tool, Metatation, which uses a pen-and-paper system with a peripheral display to utilize reader annotations as underspecified interactions to augment close reading. By turning paper-based annotations into implicit queries, Metatation provides relevant supplemental information in a just-in-time manner and acts as a bridge between close and distant reading.
Publications
-
Mehta, H., Bradley, A. J., Hancock, M., & Collins, C. (2017). Metatation: Annotation as implicit interaction to bridge close and distant reading. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24(5), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131609
@article{meh2017a, title={Metatation: Annotation as Implicit Interaction to Bridge Close and Distant Reading}, author={Hrim Mehta and Adam James Bradley and Mark Hancock and Christopher Collins}, journal = {ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)}, publisher={ACM}, pages = {35:1--35:41}, articleno = {35}, numpages = {41}, year=2017, doi = {10.1145/3131609} }